NEMOLIZUMAB

Information current as at: 1 July 2026

Legend: Completed N In progress Not applicable N Yet to commence

Submission Details

Brand name:
  • Nemluvio®
Form and strength:

Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information

Submission sponsor:
GALDERMA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use)
  • Atopic dermatitis
Listing requested:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
Funding program:
PBS General Schedule
Request authority level:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
PBAC Submission type:
New listing (Standard Re-entry Pathway)
Comment:
--
Other PBAC consideration:

Progress Details

Submission received for:
March 2026 PBAC meeting
Opportunity for consumer comment:
Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
PBAC meeting:
Held on 11/03/2026
PBAC outcome published:
Recommended (see PBAC Outcomes)
Notice of intent submitted:
18/06/2026
5Lodgement of required documentation:
6Agreement to listing arrangements:
Has not yet commenced
7Government processes:
Has not yet commenced
8Medicine listed on the PBS:
Has not yet occurred

PBAC Outcome

PBAC Recommendation:

The PBAC recommend the listing of nemolizumab (NEMO) for the treatment of patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) affecting the whole body, face, and/or hands. The PBAC welcomed input from organisations and an individual which supported the resubmission. The PBAC recalled it previously did not recommend listing NEMO as it considered the previous submission’s claim that NEMO is similarly effective to dupilumab (DUPI) was not adequately supported by the clinical data comparing NEMO and DUPI. The PBAC noted that the resubmission presented additional information which included patients who underwent a longer  period (to Week 24) of treatment with NEMO following an inadequate response after treatment with NEMO for 16 weeks. The PBAC considered that based on this new information, NEMO was likely as effective as DUPI. The PBAC’s recommendation was based on, among other matters, its assessment that the cost of NEMO should be no more than the least costly of either DUPI or upadacitinib.  The PBAC advised that NEMO should join the current risk sharing arrangement for severe AD with no increase to the expenditure caps.  

Public Summary Document:
Not yet available

Case ID
a1170
Page last updated
30 June 2026
v.9.19