MEPOLIZUMAB

Information current as at: 1 July 2026

Legend: Completed N In progress Not applicable N Yet to commence

Submission Details

Brand name:
  • Nucala®
Form and strength:

Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information

Submission sponsor:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use)
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Listing requested:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
Funding program:
PBS Section 100 (Highly Specialised Drugs Program)
Request authority level:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
PBAC Submission type:
Change to existing listing (Category 2)
Comment:
--
Other PBAC consideration:
--

Progress Details

Submission received for:
March 2026 PBAC meeting
Opportunity for consumer comment:
Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
PBAC meeting:
Held on 11/03/2026
PBAC outcome published:
Recommended (see PBAC Outcomes)
Notice of intent submitted:
28/04/2026
Lodgement of required documentation:
05/05/2026
Acceptance of complete documentation:
Accepted
Agreement to listing arrangements:
Commenced on 28/05/2026
Status:
Finalised
7Government processes:
Commenced on 04/06/2026
8Medicine listed on the PBS:
Has not yet occurred

PBAC Outcome

PBAC Recommendation:

The PBAC recommended the listing of mepolizumab as an add-on maintenance treatment for adults with uncontrolled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation (blood eosinophil ≥ 300 cells/µL). In making this recommendation, the PBAC accepted that there was a persistent clinical need for treatment options in patients who continue to experience exacerbations while receiving treatment with triple inhaled therapy. 

The PBAC acknowledged the support for this listing from individuals who would like access to mepolizumab, health care professionals and organisations. The PBAC noted that comments highlighted that COPD exacerbations (i.e. sudden worsening of symptoms) significantly limited daily functioning, contributed to a reduced quality of life, and increased the likelihood of future exacerbations. Comments also highlighted the importance of additional treatment options to help manage the significant disease burden, reduce reliance on oral corticosteroids, and ultimately improve long-term outcomes.

Overall, the PBAC considered that the submission’s claim that mepolizumab was more effective compared to triple inhaled therapy alone was reasonable but that the evidence did not allow certainty about the extent to which the additional benefit would be realised. 

The PBAC considered that a price reduction was required for mepolizumab to be considered cost-effective and that further revisions to the estimated number of patients that would use mepolizumab were required. The PBAC considered that with these revisions, the remaining uncertainties related to the estimated costs of listing mepolizumab could be managed through an arrangement to manage financial risk. The PBAC advised that if listed, the arrangement should also include dupilumab, which the PBAC also considered at the March 2026 meeting for the treatment of the same population.

The PBAC noted that flow-on changes to all PBS-subsidised biological medicines listed for nasal polyps, uncontrolled severe allergic asthma, and uncontrolled severe asthma will be required to prevent use of more than one biologic at a time for these indications including uncontrolled COPD.

Public Summary Document:
Not yet available

Case ID
a1169
Page last updated
30 June 2026
v.9.19