INCOBOTULINUMTOXINA

Information current as at: 1 July 2026

Legend: Completed N In progress Not applicable N Yet to commence

Submission Details

Brand name:
  • Xeomin®
Form and strength:

Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information

Submission sponsor:
MERZ AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use)
  • Moderate to severe spasticity of the lower limb in adults following an acute event
Listing requested:
Please see PSD for more information
Funding program:
PBS Section 100 (Botulinum Toxin Program)
Request authority level:
Please see PSD for more information
PBAC Submission type:
Change to existing listing (Category 2)
Comment:
--
Other PBAC consideration:
--

Progress Details

Submission received for:
March 2026 PBAC meeting
Opportunity for consumer comment:
Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
PBAC meeting:
Held on 11/03/2026
PBAC outcome published:
Recommended (see PBAC Outcomes)
Notice of intent submitted:
08/05/2026
5Lodgement of required documentation:
16/05/2026
Acceptance of complete documentation:
Under consideration
6Agreement to listing arrangements:
Has not yet commenced
7Government processes:
Has not yet commenced
8Medicine listed on the PBS:
Has not yet occurred

PBAC Outcome

PBAC Recommendation:

The PBAC recommended the listing of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) for the treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the lower limb in adults following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or spinal cord injury. The PBAC noted that the submission did not provide any trials comparing Xeomin directly to Botox and instead, compared Xeomin to Botox using one trial comparing Botox to placebo and two trials comparing Xeomin to placebo. While the PBAC noted there were some uncertainties with the clinical evidence, it considered that overall, Xeomin was likely as effective as botulinum toxin type A (Botox®). The PBAC’s recommendation was on the basis that it should be available only under special arrangements under Section 100 (Botulinum Toxin Program) and its assessment that Xeomin® would be cost-effective if it cost no more than the least costly of either Botox or clostridium botulinum type A toxin-haemagglutinin complex (Dysport®). The PBAC advised the equi-effective doses to be Xeomin 1 U = Botox 1 U = Dysport 3.75 U.

Public Summary Document:
Not yet available

Case ID
a1165
Page last updated
30 June 2026
v.9.19