NIVOLUMAB

Information current as at: 1 July 2026

The pharmaceutical company has not advised whether they intend to proceed or not within 60 days of receiving the ratified PBAC minutes. The process for listing is considered inactive.


Legend: Completed N In progress Not applicable N Yet to commence

Submission Details

Brand name:
  • Opdivo®
Form and strength:

Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information

Submission sponsor:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use)
  • Malignant melanoma Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) Oesophageal / Gastro-oesophageal cancers(OC/GC)
Listing requested:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
Funding program:
PBS General Schedule, PBS Section 100 (Efficient Funding of Chemotherapy Program)
Request authority level:
Please see meeting agenda for more information
PBAC Submission type:
Change to listing (Category 4)
Comment:
--
Other PBAC consideration:
--

Progress Details

Submission received for:
March 2026 PBAC meeting
Opportunity for consumer comment:
Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
PBAC meeting:
Held on 11/03/2026
PBAC outcome published:
Recommended (see PBAC Outcomes)
Notice of intent submitted:
Awaiting lodgement from pharmaceutical company
5Lodgement of required documentation:
6Agreement to listing arrangements:
Has not yet commenced
7Government processes:
Has not yet commenced
8Medicine listed on the PBS:
Has not yet occurred

PBAC Outcome

PBAC Recommendation:

The PBAC recommended the listing of nivolumab solution for subcutaneous injection 600 mg in 5 mL for use across the existing PBS‑listed indications for nivolumab, except where nivolumab is administered 3-weekly or where nivolumab is used in combination with ipilimumab. The PBAC agreed that nivolumab subcutaneous injection should be included in the existing multi‑indication (broad) listing for the treatment of immunotherapy‑sensitive advanced or metastatic cancers, and that a dual Section 100 (Efficient Funding of Chemotherapy – Related Benefits) and Section 85 (General Schedule) listing was appropriate.

The PBAC considered evidence from a head‑to‑head clinical trial and supporting pharmacokinetic studies and concluded that subcutaneous nivolumab was non‑inferior to intravenous nivolumab in terms of effectiveness and safety. The PBAC accepted that subcutaneous nivolumab offers a less invasive mode of administration and may reduce treatment time and infusion chair utilisation, without increasing system burden.

The PBAC recommended listing on a cost‑minimisation basis, accepting that 600 mg every two weeks or 1200 mg every four weeks of subcutaneous nivolumab is equi‑effective to 240 mg every two weeks or 480 mg every four weeks of intravenous nivolumab, respectively. The PBAC noted that the estimated financial impact to the PBS was a net cost saving, with modest savings over time.

The PBAC considered that the proposed prescribing instructions differentiating use to flat dosing regimens were appropriate and would support alignment with the existing broad listing arrangements. The PBAC considered that it would be appropriate for NIVO SC to join the existing risk-sharing arrangements in place for NIVO IV without any changes to caps.

Public Summary Document:
Not yet available

Case ID
a1171
Page last updated
30 June 2026
v.9.19