TOFERSEN
Information current as at: 1 July 2026
Submission Details
- Brand name:
-
- Qalsody®
- Form and strength:
-
Please search for and view the meeting agenda from the relevant meeting for more information
- Submission sponsor:
- BIOGEN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Condition/indication:
(therapeutic use) -
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
- Listing requested:
- Please see meeting agenda for more information
- Funding program:
- PBS Section 100 (Highly Specialised Drugs Program)
- Request authority level:
- Please see meeting agenda for more information
- PBAC Submission type:
- New PBS listing (Early Re-entry Pathway)
- Comment:
- --
- Other PBAC consideration:
Progress Details
-
Submission received for: - March 2026 PBAC meeting
-
Opportunity for consumer comment: - Open 19/11/2025 and close 21/01/2026 (see PBS Website)
-
PBAC meeting: - Held on 11/03/2026
-
Lodgement of required documentation: - 20/04/2026
-
Acceptance of complete documentation:
- Accepted
-
6Agreement to listing arrangements:
- Commenced on 12/06/2026
-
Status:
- Under consideration
-
7Government processes:
- Has not yet commenced
-
8Medicine listed on the PBS:
- Has not yet occurred
PBAC Outcome
The PBAC recommended listing tofersen (Qalsody®) on the PBS for the treatment of patients
with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) who have a superoxide dimutase 1 (SOD1) gene
pathogenic variant.
The PBAC recalled receiving input from individuals, health care professionals and
organisations in November 2025 with the original submission. It noted the high unmet
need for targeted treatments for this rare subtype of ALS. The PBAC acknowledged the
progressive nature of the disease and that any slowing of disease progression or retention
of functional capacities was a crucial factor in improving patient quality of life.
The PBAC recalled that in November 2025 it had considered that, although not demonstrated
statistically in the trial, based on biomarkers (plasma neurofilament light chain,
an indicator of neurological disease progression), tofersen was likely more effective
than best supportive care at slowing the progression of SOD1-ALS and increasing overall
survival. However, the PBAC noted that the effect of tofersen in preventing loss of
physical function would likely be modest. The PBAC considered that given the progressive
nature of SOD1-ALS, stabilisation of disease would still be beneficial for patients,
their families and their carers. The PBAC also previously noted that tofersen was
less safe than best supportive care, with side effects mainly associated with its
administration via lumbar puncture.
The PBAC considered that the cost requested by the sponsor in the resubmission was
acceptable. The PBAC also considered that the estimates of eligible patients and associated
costs presented in the resubmission were reasonable with minor changes. The PBAC considered
that the risk sharing arrangement proposed by the sponsor would mitigate the risk
associated with the uncertain long-term benefits of tofersen and the uncertain duration
of therapy.
The PBAC advised that the listing would require changes to the restrictions for the
PBS-listed medicine edaravone to prevent combined use of edaravone and tofersen.
